Please note: You only need to register / login if you wish to make representations.
If you haven't got an account you can register now.
If you have forgotten your password you can request a new password.
You can view the full details of a representation by clicking either on the Representation ID in the top right of the summary box or on the More Details... link at the bottom.
COMMENT Essex County Council (Matthew Jericho)
ECC recommends inclusion of specific reference to 'walking/cycling distance via a safe route' to the named services and facilities. ECC is liable for long term school transportation costs where a school is not within safe walking distance of home. Further, the safely accessible schools should be capable of accommodating pupils from the travelling community within existing spare capacity, given the unlikelihood of developer contributions being secured from traveller site proposals.
More details about Rep ID: 2522
COMMENT Natural England (Kayleigh Cheese)
This policy seeks to allocate the remaining requirement of pitches, (outside of Severalls Hospital Development), within the garden communities. Consideration needs to be given to any impact this could have on protected sites, particularly within the Marks Tey area which is within/adjacent to the SSSI.
More details about Rep ID: 2468
COMMENT The Gypsy Council (Mrs Christine Atkins)
Consider that the Local Plan should make better provision for Gypsies and travellers including land for a transit site.
Express views that there is a need for the needs of gypsies and travellers to have a fairer hearing and be considered alongside other housing needs.
More details about Rep ID: 2404
SUPPORT Chelmsford City Council (Miss Claire Stuckey)
The City Council supports the approach of making provision for its identified need for Gypsy and Travellers as part of new development and by expansion of an existing site at Severalls.
Further work continues to update the OAHN with the latest household projections, and the Essex wide Gypsy and Travellers Needs Assessment (GTAA) is also under-going a refresh in light of the changes to the Planning Policy for Traveller Sites (PPTS). Any changes in the level of needs arising as a result of these updates will need to continue to be met.
More details about Rep ID: 2203
COMMENT A.H Corin
DM11 also states that the existing Severalls site should be expanded. In my view it should certainly NOT be expanded. It constitutes yet more urban sprawl, creeping across the A12 beyond Colchester's northern limit.
More details about Rep ID: 2201
COMMENT Jan Plummer
I object to development of this ancient landscape. It contains beautiful bluebell woods, streams, and an ancient hill settlement. It provides good quality of life for a deprived area. children from Greenstead sledge down the fields In the snow, people fish in the ponds and walk straight out into the countryside.
However, if it is built on, then a 15 pitch Gyosy and Traveller site should be part of the plan. Places are sorely needed so that Travellers are not continually moved on and can access school, health and education. It would also help Tendring to fulfil its obligation.
More details about Rep ID: 2070
COMMENT Mr Richard Crabb
Small scale expansion of the existing Severalls site, whilst undesirable, is the most sound option. Creation of new sites to the west of Colchester, particularly that combined with the West Tey proposals, would further strain the public purse as site management and law enforcement services would need to be further dispersed to deal with the acoompanying increase in localised crime, public disturbance, litter, and human waste that invariably accompanies such sites.
More details about Rep ID: 1414
COMMENT Marks Tey Church (Rev Ian Scott-Thompson)
Severalls is mentioned. Does the site down Turkey Cock Lane Stanway also count? Provision needs to be adequate to prevent nuisance.
More details about Rep ID: 926