Local Plan

Please note: You only need to register / login if you wish to make representations.

Representation 712 on Preferred Options Local Plan by Mr & Mrs A. Hammond

Support / Object: OBJECT
Document Link: Preferred Options Local Plan - Sustainable Settlements, Mersea Island, SS17a: Mersea Housing and Employment
Representation: Seeking clarification within the areas of 1. - Access, 2. - Services and 3. - Safety in relation to the Plan as published so far.

Further to our earlier comments, still very valid, we would now like to add another safety and infrastructure concern due to the government's announcement that Hinkley Point, and therefore Bradwell, nuclear power stations are likely to proceed.
The Island's roads and particularly the Strood access/ egress point would become a major hazard during an emergency evacuation for the current population. Any extra development would obviously increase such public safety risk.

Original submission

3 Stable Mews,
West Mersea,
Colchester,
ESSEX CO5 8HR
(01206) 383 383 or Mob:0777 955 1229
Alan@3stablemews.co.uk
Planning Policy, Colchester Borough Council
Rowan House, 33 Sheepen Road,
Colchester,
Essex, CO3 3WG
3rd September 2016
Colchester Borough Council Local Plan - Mersea Island
My wife and I have recently been to extremely well attended local meetings to discuss the potential
impact of the CBC Local Plan within our own community of Mersea Island. As we understand it the
'plan' is nearing the end of the public consultation phase and we further understand that there are
currently going forward two 'preferred sites' upon Mersea Island being to the north and south of East
Road near its junction with Dawes Lane.
We also understand that Colchester Borough Council is under some pressure to respond to
government led initiatives for the creation of further housing but the numbers proposed on Mersea in
these two closely linked locations do lead us to have some concerns for which we would be grateful
for your advice and guidance. We list them below within categories for reference/ response purposes.
1. Access - the current plan states that access to both preferred sites (one for 150 properties, the
other for 200 properties) will both be from East Road and within approx. 300 yards of each other.
Some points arise from this.
a) There would then be SEVEN significant junctions on the busy East Road within a total of 400
yards (Dawes Lane, Cross Lane, Stable Close, Brierley Paddocks, Brierley Road, Seaview
Avenue, Wellhouse). Although busy under normal circumstances this section of East Road/
Dawes Lane is the natural alternative emergency exit from the Island should the main
Colchester Road exit be unavailable for any reason. Road safety in this area does concern us
and we feel the planning authority would have a view on this?
b) The developer of the north side (Mersea Homes) has stated that they would prefer access
from Dawes Lane for their scheduled 150 homes. However this Lane is very narrow and
existing traffic needs to slow to allow passing, with larger vehicles (caravans, lorries etc.)
requiring one vehicle to give way entirely for safe passage. Would Dawes Lane have to be
widened to allow extra development along its length for such number of extra properties?
c) If the north side access were to be through Wellhouse, as per the planning document, there
has already been safety concerns recorded with and expressed by the Local Council for
emergency vehicle (Fire, Ambulance) access to this constricted estate. Would a further 150
houses warrant a safe development or would an extra access provision be required?
2. Services - local opinion and experience already leads us to believe that many Island services are
under considerable pressure at the present population density.
a) Regularly mentioned are doctors, dentist, school capacity, lack of police presence, car parking
and seasonal expansion via holiday makers.
b) However a concern that has been mentioned at the large public meeting was that Anglian
Water are struggling to cope with sewage densities especially after heavy rain and during
seasonal population expansion. Particularly, but not exclusively, the local oyster fishing trade
depends upon clean water and we gather that Anglian Water already sometimes have to
discharge polluted water when their capacity is overloaded. Is this something of which the
planning authorities are aware?
c) The northern preferred site already suffers from extensive flooding during high rainfall. This
has required the farmer John Gray to send across his staff to dig drainage channels to the
nearest ditch. Regrettably such action can overwhelm the ditch and lead to flooding of garden
and outbuildings in Stable Close and Mews. The problem has increased following the
Wellhouse development and any extra properties in the proposed location would surely lead to
even greater water 'run-off'. See photos for some views of the flooding. Are planning
guidelines in place to ensure adequate drainage from any proposed new developments?
3. Safety - you will of course know of the huge concern within the community regarding any
proposed new Nuclear Power station at Bradwell. Could you please advise if any of the Local Plan
under discussion takes any account of the issues raised by the Nuclear proposal - especially any
mass evacuation requirement as part of an Emergency Plan?
We would be pleased to receive your replies and opinion on the matters and concerns raised within
the specific points above.
Thank you and,
Yours Faithfully,
Alan & Sue Hammond

Attached Files for this Submission


Having trouble using the system? Visit our help page or contact us directly.

Powered by OpusConsult

Related Articles